Monday, May 4, 2020


*              News
The Cal State Companies:  Center for Real Estate Studies ¨ Cal State Properties ¨ Cal State Investment LTD Partnership
¨E-Mail CalStatecompanie@aol.com  ¨ Webpage calstatecompanies.com


Media Contact: The Center for RE Studies                        For: Immediate Release

Discover a Vehicle to Invest in Real Estate Using Little of Your Own Money

How can you invest in real estate using little of your own money?  In this article, you will discover an amazing way of gathering investors that won’t break your bank.

Calstatecompanies introduces a relatively unknown form of ownership to effectively gather active investors. It is called tenants-in-common (TIC).  It’s an easy, low-cost method of funding real estate investments while maintaining tax benefits.

OWNERSHIP FEATURES THAT PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY

Tenants-in-common is a form of ownership that may involve two or more people, and it does not require a marital relationship. With a tenants-in-common ownership:

1. There can be two or more co-owners, but their ownership interests need not be equal. For example, if three people are co-owners, one could have a share of 25 percent, another 30 percent, and the third 45 percent.

2. There is no automatic right of survivorship. Unlike joint tenancy, a share in the property held by one owner does not automatically pass to the other owners at death. When a tenants-in-common owner dies, that owner’s interest is transferred to his or her heirs and not to the other tenants-in-common, unless there’s an agreement giving title to the co-owners.

3. Interest held by tenants-in-common may be sold separately by individual owners. In many cases, when tenants-in-common first acquire the property, they agree to give the other co-owners a “first right of refusal” to buy out one another.

WAYS TO SAVE WITH A TENANTS-IN-COMMONOWNERSHIP

Here are seven advantages of the tenants-in-common ownership over other entities:

1. Low set-up costs: Compared to other forms of ownership, tenants-in-common has one of the lowest set-up costs. You don’t need an attorney to prepare offering circulars or registration with governmental agencies. In fact, all that is required is to have the names of the owners recorded when the transaction closes. A formal document is not necessary, though we would recommend one. Accounting fees for preparing partnership, trusts, and corporation returns are eliminated as well as state and federal income taxes.

2. Low down payment: In some public offerings, restrictions are imposed on the use of leverage. Using the tenants-in-common form of ownership, there are none. This is an important investment strategy in purchasing and selling midsize apartment complexes. The lower the down payment, the more leverage, and the more property you can control.

3. Active voice in management: An important investment goal is to reduce taxes. The tenants-in-common form of ownership does this by allowing an active voice in management. Tenants-in-common owners, with the help of qualified consultants, are extremely effective in making the right decisions. The old adage “two heads are better than one” hits the bull’s-eye, especially when these heads are concentrating on becoming wealthy.

4. Ease of transferability: Unlike a certification of ownership in a partnership, the tenants-in-common ownership has a greater degree of transferability.  Each owner’s name is on the deed and is recorded. An owner’s interest can be sold, hypothecated, willed, or transferred without the consent of the other co-owners, and each owner has complete control of his or her interest. In evaluating collateral, lenders generally give more credence to an interest in a recorded tenants-in-common interest than in a limited partnership.

5. Economy of scale: Because investment dollars are being accumulated by a group, there are more dollars available to purchase larger properties. Many individual investors don’t have the opportunity to use the economies of scale unless they form a group. How does this concept apply? If one unit is vacant in a four-unit complex, you have 25 percent vacancies. On the other hand, if one unit is vacant in a 40-unitcomplex, the vacancies would be 2.5 percent. 

Just think about it! When the carpet layer is called, to whom do you think the better square-foot price will be given, the owner of the 40-unit building or the four-unit building? The same applies to all vendors.

6. No mortgage or qualifying restrictions: Unlike most public limited partnerships, tenants-in-common ownership doesn’t have any restrictions for financing or investor qualifications. Financing can be structured to give the greatest flexibility to each individual owner either at the time of purchase or sale. The group is formed based on the needs and desires of its members not on standards imposed by governmental agencies. Individual owners don’t need a minimum or maximum net worth to invest. They’re not required to have someone attest to their capability of making their own investment decisions. Nor are they forced to have experts make these decisions for them.

7. Tax advantages: Using the tenants-in-common form of ownership, gives you the opportunity to become an active investor. As such, you can qualify for the $25,000 per year write-off against your salary, dividends, interest, and other income. This form of ownership provides the flexibility needed to implement the tax-saving strategies discussed earlier. Other forms of ownership satisfying only passive investor requirements do not have these capabilities.

8. Neither a real estate nor a securities license is required to form a private tenants-in-common group to invest in real estate. If you do not manage or control the group, it doesn’t have to be registered or qualified with any governmental agency as a security.

TAX IMPACT OF TENANTS-IN-COMMON OWNERSHIP

Deferred income on recognition of taxable gain when selling rental property (the Internal Revenue code section 1031) mandates that the tenant-in-common co-ownership must meet these four requirements:

1. To form a tenants-in-common group, each of the co-owners must hold interest as tenants-in-common. No one can previously have held interest in the property in any other legal entity (for example partnership).

2. The allocation of income and expenses as well as liability for blanket and encumbrance shall be in accordance with the co-owner’s percentage interest and ownership interest.

3. All of the co-owners of the entity must have the right to vote on all issues of the ownership. An owner or sponsor or manager may advance funds to cover payments due from another co-owner. This debt must be paid within 31 days.

4. There is an exit requirement that each co-owner retains a right to transfer, petition, or encumber their ownership interest.

New Guidelines for Tenants-in-Common Interest

Procedure 2022-22 provides guidelines in the use of fractional interest in the replacement properties in the 1031 exchange. The key criteria are:

1. The number of tenants-in-common cannot exceed 35.

2. The sponsor of interest may own the property or an interest there for     only 6 months before 100 percent of the interest can be sold.

3. Any decision having a material impact on the property, owners must be approved unanimously by the owners.

4. The management agreement must be renewed annually and must provide for market rate compensation.

SUMMARY

There are definite advantages to group ownership. Probably the most prevalent is economy of scale. The tenants-in-common form of ownership provides a simple, low-cost way for investors to form groups, while maintaining many tax benefits.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Eugene E. Vollucci, is considered to be one of the foremost authorities on real estate taxation and investing and has authored books in these fields published by John Wiley & Sons of New York. He is the Director of the Center for RE Studies, a real estate research organization and President of calstatecompanies. To learn more about the Center, please visit our web site at http://www.calstatecompanies.com








Wednesday, April 8, 2020


*                 News
The Cal State Companies:  Center for Real Estate Studies ¨ Cal State Properties ¨ Cal State Investment LTD Partnership
¨ E-Mail CalStatecompanie@aol.com  ¨ Webpage calstatecompanies.com

Media Contact: The Center for RE Studies                   For: Immediate Release

Three Impending Scenarios for Real Estate
We at the Calstatecompanies Center for Real Estate Studies have been investigating the pandemic’s effect on the real estate market using three different scenarios that may potentially emerge.
     Deploying different scenarios allowed us to investigate the impacts of the virus on real estate markets and the most consistent investment conclusions. We developed three scenarios to highlight the influence. Before looking at the specifics of each scenario, we started by laying out the common ground for all three scenarios followed by the description of a downside scenario, an upside scenario and our base scenario.
     Currently, the full impact of the disease on the numbers of infections, mortality and recovered people is unknown. The measures necessary to contain the spreading of the virus are also uncertain. Assumptions about the intensity and the effectiveness of these measures are reflected in the outcomes of these scenarios.
Downside scenario In the downside scenario, the containment policies are not enough to halt the spread of the coronavirus. Our governments would be forced to extend current policies. These policy measures may prove to be insufficient and the real estate market may not recover.
Consequences Given this scenario, we would likely recommend a “sell” in our quarterly newsletter Market Cycles. The stronger USD, elevated uncertainty and continued disruptions would likely cause us to close our real estate investments. According to Green Advisors, shares of property-owning trusts, are down 42% from their peak Feb. 21 through March 23. Mall values? Off 61%. Hotels? Down 52%. Apartments? Down 43%. Compare that damage with a 33% drop in the broad market's S& P 500 benchmark investments to zero.

       Upside Scenario The rate of new contaminations would start to decelerate sooner and faster than expected causing our government to gradually relax containment policies, allowing GDP growth to normalize. Real estate would rebound from depressed level restoring demand. The size of fiscal policy measures would prove to be enough to offset income and earnings losses sooner than expected, initiating a recovery during the second half of 2020.
Consequences Given this scenario, we would likely recommend a “buy” in our quarterly newsletter Market Cycles. It may give breathing space for long-term benefits from a quick recovery. Inflation and wage pressures would likely be close to zero.  With containment, the expectation of the final completion of the disease, real estate would be the preferred investment.
 Base Scenario This scenario mainly outlines our basic thinking about the impact of the outbreak of coronavirus on the real estate market. First and most importantly, we expect the current situation to be temporary. This scenario may only slow the rising rate of infections. Our politicians, however, would be more reluctant to take additional restrictive measures and would likely only abandon the most restrictive measures. Real estate markets would recover slowly. However, a potential second wave of infections would force our government to immediately reintroduce restrictions which may remain in place for longer. In such a case, demand may only rebound gradually. As the restriction are not sufficient and timely, the real estate market will continue to struggle.
Consequences Given this scenario, we would likely recommend a “hold” in our quarterly newsletter Market Cycles. We would act more cautiously as demand may not be strong enough to revitalize growth. Given the uncertainty about the future development of the disease, real estate markets are not expected to rise to pre-crisis levels. With the gradual and slow return of the real estate market economy, it may be advisable to diversify your real estate investments in “pockets of opportunity” defined by calstatecompanies Center for Real Estate Studies.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Eugene E. Vollucci, is considered to be one of the foremost authorities on real estate taxation and investing and has authored books in these fields published by John Wiley & Sons of New York. He is the Director of the Center for RE Studies, a real estate research organization and President of calstatecompanies. To learn more about the Center, please visit our web site at http://www.calstatecompanies.com





Sunday, March 15, 2020


*                   News
The Cal State Companies:  Center for Real Estate Studies ¨ Cal State Properties ¨ Cal State Investment LTD Partnership
¨E-Mail CalStatecompanie@aol.com  ¨ Webpage calstatecompanies.com




Media Contact: The Center for RE Studies                        For: Immediate Release

Taxpayers Can’t Believe These Medical Tax Deductions
The single most important thing to remember to get a tax deduction for medical expenses is to “get the prescription”.  This document will survive a tax audit. This article will disclose some of the eye-opening medical deductions the IRS has allowed.
Medical deductions
You can only deduct medical expenses that exceed the limitations under the new tax rules, but the IRS and court decisions have expanded the definition of deductible medical costs. Plan ahead to take advantage of as many medical expenses as possible.
Medical deductions can be taken for the costs of diagnosis, treatment or prevention of disease or for affecting any structure or function of the body (except for unnecessary cosmetic surgery). Limitations: Treatment must be specific and not for general health improvement.
Example: The IRS successfully denied deductions for the cost of weight­ control and stop-smoking classes that were designed to improve general health, not to treat a specific ailment or disease. On the other hand, a person with a health problem specifically related to being overweight such as high blood pressure might be allowed the deductions.
If an employer tells an overweight employee to lose weight or leave, and the boss has previously enforced such a rule, the plump employee can deduct the cost of a weight-loss program, because money spent to help keep a taxpayer’s job is deductible. The IRS says it will allow a deduction if a physician prescribes a weight reduction program for the treatment of hypertension, obesity or hearing problems. The same could go for a person whose doctor certifies that an end to cigarette smok­ing is necessary for a specific medical reason (such as emphysema).
The same logic applies to home improvements. The cost of a swimming pool might be deductible if it is specifically necessary for a person who has polio, as would the cost of an elevator for a heart patient.
Caution:  Only the actual cost is deductible. The IRS makes taxpayers subtract from the cost of an improvement the amount that the features add to the value of the residence
Example: If a swimming pool costs $10,000 but adds $4,000 to the value of the property: only $6,000 would be tax-deductible. To determine the value have the property appraised before and after the improvement (The appraisal fee is deduct­ible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction).
IRS Deductions can be arbitrary:
 A professional singer was not allowed to deduct the cost of throat treatments as a business expense, but an IRS agent did allow a deduction for a dancer who found it necessary to her career to have silicone breast implants.
Medically unproven treatment is generally deductible, since the IRS has taken the position that it cannot make judgments in the medical field.  For example, Laetrile treat­ments are deductible if the taxpayer receives them. So is legal marijuana.

A medically prescribed diet is deductible only to the extent that its cost exceeds that of a regular diet. Since fish, vegetables, breads, and poultry are common elements of a normal diet, it is highly doubtful that the IRS would allow a deduction for them.

Taxpayers on special diets may be able to get some kind of deduction under certain circumstances. For example, when a person who was traveling was required to have a salt-free diet, the Tax Court did allow him to deduct charges imposed by restaurants for preparing such meals, as well as taxi fares that he had to pay to get to the restaurants that were willing to prepare them.

Unusual Medical Deductions
Acupuncture
• Addiction therapy    
• Clarinet and lessons bought on a doctor's advice to correct tooth defects.
• Companion hired to escort blind children to school
• Contact lens insurance
• Dentures, hearing aids, orthopedic shoes.
• Detachable home installation such as air conditioners, heaters, humidifiers, air cleansers used for the benefit of sick person
• Dust-free room for people who have allergies.
• Elastic stockings ordered by a doctor to alleviate varicose veins
• Extra rent for a larger apartment required to make room for a nurse/attendant
• Fluoridation device installed at home on a dentist’s recommendation
• Long-distance telephone counseling for a person with a drug problem
• Maintenance costs of a home swimming pool for a person with emphysema
• Mattress and boards to alleviate an arthritic condition
• Sex counseling by a psychiatrist for a husband and wife
• Trained cat to alert its hearing-impaired owner to unusual sounds
• Wigs to alleviate mental stress caused by loss of hair
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Eugene E. Vollucci, is considered to be one of the foremost authorities on real estate taxation and investing and has authored books in these fields published by John Wiley & Sons of New York. He is the Director of the Center for RE Studies, a real estate research organization and President of calstatecompanies. To learn more about the Center, please visit our web site at http://www.calstatecompanies.com







Friday, March 6, 2020



         News      
The Cal State Companies:  Center for Real Estate Studies ¨ Cal State Properties ¨ Cal State Investment LTD Partnership
¨ E-Mail CalStatecompanie@aol.com  ¨ Webpage http://www.calstatecompanies.com


Real Estate Investment Conclusions
and the Coronavirus

      The outbreak of the coronavirus  and the spread of the disease to other parts of the world have caused rising fears of a global pandemic, with an immediate negative impact on real estate markets. 

     Moreover, vulnerability increased over the course of last year, making prospects for early 2020 all the more uncertain. The US, the world’s second-largest economy, appeared relatively resilient, but 2.1% real GDP growth in the fourth quarter of 2019 hardly qualifies as thriving.

     The lack of Chinese demand is also likely to take a toll on the US economy, where China plays an important role as America’s third-largest and most rapidly growing export market. The sharp plunge in a preliminary tally of US purchasing managers’ sentiment for February hints at just such a possibility and underscores the time-honored adage that no country is an oasis in a uncertain global economy.



     The coronavirus is undoubtedly causing a significant disruption to economic activity in the US. The magnitude of US growth is highly uncertain, as it depends on the extent that it spreads, the length of contagion, the measures taken by the US to curtail the risk of infection and the timeframe until an appropriate vaccine has been developed. This uncertainty with respect to the ultimate impact on economic activity will keep a real estate market volatility higher. 
     But as long as the outcome of the current situation is highly uncertain, we should continue to stick to buying properties in “pockets of opportunity” areas as reported in our companies’ quarterly newsletter Market Cycles. As historical evidence shows, the outbreaks of such diseases are temporary in nature.
     Remember, real estate allows you to control your risk because you can actively participate in the decision-making process. Passive investments such as stocks don’t give you this opportunity. Movements in real estate values are less erratic than in the stock market. Most people don’t understand the economic forces influencing the market. Since real estate is less volatile, it’s easier to control and to understand.  Real estate is tangible. You can touch it, you’ve been exposed to it all your life, and you can identify with it. As a result of this familiarity, you are better able to understand it. 
     In the end, epidemiologists will have the final say on the endgame for coronavirus and its economic impact. While that science is well beyond our expertise, we take the point that the current strain of coronavirus seems to be more contagious but less lethal than SARS was in early 2003.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Eugene E. Vollucci, is considered to be one of the foremost authorities on real estate taxation and investing and has authored books in these fields published by John Wiley & Sons of New York. He is the Director of the Center for RE Studies, a real estate research organization and President of calstatecompanies. To learn more about the Center, please visit our web site at http://www.calstatecompanies.com










Tuesday, February 25, 2020


         News      
The Cal State Companies:  Center for Real Estate Studies ¨ Cal State Properties ¨ Cal State Investment LTD Partnership
¨E-Mail CalStatecompanie@aol.com  ¨ Webpage http://www.calstatecompanies.com


Coronavirus and the Real Estate Markets



The coronavirus has been the toughest force behind the recent volatility in real estate markets, which has been running uninterrupted since October 2019. We should be aware that real estate markets could react ahead of the peak of the epidemic, as they tend to overreact at the beginning of a crisis and then stabilize and rebound, despite the continuation of negative news. Unless this doubt is able to disrupt our economy into a shock wave – which is not thinking now – excessive downward setbacks could provide an opportunity for investors to acquire real estate with attractive valuations and good fundamentals.

Brexit and the US/China trade impasse were the headline stories of 2019, but the probability of a worst-case scenario on both issues has meanwhile clearly diminished. We see sufficient goodwill in the most recent US/China rhetoric to suggest that some of the previously announced tariffs could be cancelled rather than just postponed. Such an outcome might provide much needed confidence. However, the US, economic growth is expected to slow down in the near term, as the effects of weak growth, uncertainty and slower hiring continue to weigh on real estate investment. Nevertheless, policy actions by the government and the central bank to ease and maintain supportive financial conditions, lower rates, sound economic activity in the US service sector and robust job creation should result in sustainable growth of disposable income, strong domestic demand and private consumption, and thus drive US GDP higher in 2020. The US housing market could become a further source for an acceleration of economic growth in the US. Moreover, credit score requirements for new mortgages have eased compared to the level in 2018.

The decline in mortgage rates in 2019 has substantially improved the buy-to-rent and payment-to-income affordability ratios. According to the US Census Bureau, the median price-to-rent ratio (median home value divided by the median annual rent equals the median price-to-rent ratio) has fallen to 17.91, a level which compares to the ratios seen in 2015/2016 and is only slightly higher than the median ratio of 16 during 2004 to 2006. In 2007/2008, during the period when the US real estate market heated up, this ratio moved to 24.5, and then declined in the aftermath of the financial crisis back to below 20 in 2011. A very similar picture emerges by looking at the payment-to-income affordability ratio, which also stands at levels comparable with those of 2015/2016.

Another phenomenon is now  clearer. The excess homes built prior to the crisis have finally been digested, and the US housing market is now entering a period of overall scarcity, in which potential housing demand exceeds housing starts and housing inventories. US household formation is now growing faster than housing starts, which indicates that investments to grow the housing stock are needed to fill this gap. `Average annual household formations have risen since the period between 2013 and 2016, when they stood at around 1 million per year, and in 2019 now stand at approximately 1.45 million, an acceleration of about 45%, according the US Census Bureau. For the period 2017 to 2019, housing starts dropped behind household formations when they increased by only 18%. Against the backdrop of low funding costs and robust income projections for the next couple of years, this might result in excess demand for new apartments, and given an income multiplier greater than one, residential investment spending could spur GDP growth in the US.

Benefits of the partial solution for the US/China trade tension and the definitive Brexit decision will, however, outweigh the increasing concerns with respect to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus in China. We believe these corrections in real estate prices are only temporary in nature. We therefore currently do not intend to change our projections or our recommendations to purchase real estate in “pockets of opportunity” as pointed out in our quarterly research report MARKET CYCLES.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Eugene E. Vollucci, is considered to be one of the foremost authorities on real estate taxation and investing and has authored books in these fields published by John Wiley & Sons of New York. He is the Director of the Center for RE Studies, a real estate research organization and President of calstatecompanies. To learn more about the Center, please visit our web site at http://www.calstatecompanies.com